A suppository sex appeal, fashion of the moment kind of guy

Miu Miu bag You have to pass it to Tony Abbott. This week, he hit three three, turned to a troika bloopers impressive campaign in three days. If it is not based on election results, so I do not know what it is. On Monday we had the "suppository of wisdom" on Tuesday, he followed the call "sex appeal" and on Wednesday we had the same-sex marriage as a "fashion moment" (though to be honest, Abbott later said he was more broadly to the "tradition"). While the media had a (predictable) Picnic 10 courses at disproof comments came the (predictable), the focus on gaffes stoopid? Show me the damn policy! Election campaigns are ripe for bloopering. Larger and older increased media appearances threads = more gaffes. But they should not be dissed hand as mere distraction. The candidates say and pressure can be very revealing. How, how to manage the resulting wounds. Take "Sex Appeal" for example. Of the three, it has the potential to cause harm, because it gets directly into Abbott's Super Cup Achilles heel - the ol 'woman problem'. Localized in one direction, there was no obvious damage done by Abbott remark. Fiona Scott - the appealee Sex - Ray Hadley called the next day to laugh happily and describe him as a "great compliment". Election chances by Scott Lindsay are also very healthy, with Lonergan Guardian survey, which is a whopping 60 percent of the primary vote on it Friday. Miu Miu bag But Abbott's team has spent years trying to smooth wrinkles (real or perceived) in the credentials of the chicken head the coalition. So off as "sex appeal" spread disapproval Abbott moved his remark that evening (though not excuse) and notes that he was "a little exuberant." The next day he described as a "moment of Dad." In fact, his daughter Bridget Abbott had a similar line, the observation of the light heart of the track: "You know, Dad racing Prime Minister, not father, he can not dad-it kind of moment ... I think every father is a bit daggy in their own way. " Let's make no mistake about it, the family plays an important role in the 2013 campaign - for both parties. Not only Margie and Frances "Babe Bridgie" campaign with Abbott for this feeling of well-being (there is even talk of a return before September 7 Louise), they are also part of his armor. See how Bridget objectively sexist comment of his father turned into a single incident of the eye-roll Dadtown - something that was safe, legal and unthreateningly common. What father in Australia does not have a comment that their children have jumped made on a form bewildered horror? What child in Australia was not disturbed by popping them? Abbott family also niftily softened his image on same-sex marriage. While the conservative Catholic Abbott insisted on marriage equality is not a priority, many voters say otherwise. So it does not hurt that earlier this year, Bridget and Frances an interview in which she talked about her support for the cause. Or his sister Christine Forster spoke of "significant change" Abbott on the Triple J this week. And describes how his family, he was less judgmental when it came out about five years ago. At first glance, a lesbian activist sister or girl openness seems controversial leader of the Liberals. But it does not allow Abbott have his cake and eat it too: the promise of reform, without marrying them to offer themselves. The family of Kevin Rudd is no less important in the campaign. Sounds Nicolas and Marcus work for him and Jessica Rudd and Therese Rein are constantly alongside Rudd, either personally or through a tweet. Jessica, in particular, adds a certain sincerity Rudd Damascusing road on same-sex marriage. Than last month, he said: "Many young people, including my own daughter, Jess told me long and hard ... on marriage equality." In addition, as Rudd chaotic critics say his revenge to bundle him when he has such a sweet grandbaby? Bring the family in the political arena is not new. Politicians have long been known for their spouses and children as proof that they have the "right" values ​​and are just as "real" as a voter on the street. But if they are integrated into the political and policy debates, they still offer something different. Because families are not elected, they are not subject to the same level of scrutiny as politicians hyper parents. This is just cruel. So we can move beyond the difficult questions and inconsistencies and go directly to the warm fuzzy stuff. And in an election, it is not to love about that? Miu Miu handbag